Legal Opinion
Calkins v. Midland Funding NCC-2 Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 31, 2006No. 1:04-00300PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT,” DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO STRIKE ...,” AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT”
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a “Motion for Summary Judgment,” filed by Defendants Midland Funding NCC-2 Corp. (“Midland Funding”) and Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“Midland Credit”) on May 26, 2005. Also pending before the court are two motions filed by Plaintiff Herman Calkins on December 14, 2005: a motion to amend the complaint and a mo tion to strike certain exhibits attached to Defendants’ motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wagle v. CorizonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023