Legal Opinion

Brandal v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2006No. S-11770PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case arises from the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission's (CFEC) denial of Henry Brandal's application for a limited entry permit to fish in the Chignik purse seine fishery. Brandal, who has lived and fished in Kodiak for four decades, initially applied for a permit in 1977 and received a recommended decision denying his application in 1982. But the application was not officially denied for another twenty-two years, during which Brandal continued to fish.

Brandal appeals the superior court's affir-mance of the CFEC's decision on both substantive and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mimi Cutler, Stephen D. Annand and National Council of Senior Citizens v. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Miller v. MoredockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Roberts v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API