Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2018No. A-17-686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arterburn, Judge.

*40 I. INTRODUCTION

Dan Kaiser appeals and Metropolitan Utilities District (MUD) cross-appeals from an order entered by the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court finding Kaiser had suffered a work-related injury, awarding a 70-percent loss of earning capacity, and finding him entitled to 300 weeks of permanent partial disability benefits and 43.1429 weeks of temporary total disability benefits. On appeal, Kaiser argues *452 the compensation court erred in failing to find him to have suffered a 100-percent loss of earning capacity and in failing to find him to be totally disabled. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sidel v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tchikobava v. Albatross ExpressNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Gardner v. International Paper Destr. & Recycl.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Variano v. Dial Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Homstad v. Block 21Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Kaiser v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Martinez v. International Paper Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Sellers v. Reefer SystemsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Ulrich v. Arjo-Century DistributingNebraska Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API