Legal Opinion

Corson v. Crocker

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1916No. Civ. No. 1571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action to quiet title to certain real estate. The plaintiff had judgment, from which this appeal is prosecuted by the defendant, Josephine Arata, upon a transcript of the record prepared in pursuance of the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff claims title under a deed executed by the Modesto Irrigation District, a corporation, the property in dispute lying within the boundaries of said district, and having been sold on default of the owner in the payment of an assessment levied thereon by the district in the year 1905.

The appealing defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McGowan v. ElderIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bruschi v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Numitor Gold Mining Co. v. KatzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Adams v. SleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API