Westerwald Pottery Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Westerwald Pottery Corporation (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to deny the suspension and modification petitions filed by Employer. We vacate and remand.
On March 8, 1992, Rogenna Watters (Claimant) sustained a work-related injury to her right shoulder. However, Claimant continued to work for Employer in. a light duty capacity, receiving workers’ compensation benefits for partial disability pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable. (WCJ’s Findings of Fact, Nos.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Iacono v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Goodwill Industries of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karpulk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Worth & Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Brooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Brockway Glass)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- South Hills Movers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003