Legal Opinion

South Hills Movers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEADBETTER, Judge.

South Hills Movers (employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying employer’s petition to modify or suspend compensation benefits payable to Ervin Porter. The issue raised on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) and the Board erred in concluding that employer’s modified fight-duty position was not actually available to Porter due to non-medically related circumstances. We affirm.

In December of 1997, Porter sustained a work-related injury while working as a mover/packer for South Hills Movers and was, subsequently,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Westerwald Pottery Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PA Department of Corrections/SCI-Greensburg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. A. Nahas v. WCAB (Synergistic Partners, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API