Legal Opinion

Goland v. Peter Nolan & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. L. A. 13090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant corporation following an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a general and special demurrer to the second amended complaint.

This complaint is in two counts, the first for malicious prosecution of a civil action and the second upon stockholders’ liability for the same cause of action. Count one states a cause of action. Count two is defective and ordinarily we would sustain the ruling of the trial court as to it, but the defendants are all sued by fictitious names and no one of them has been served with process or has appeared in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCusker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Berson v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Pacific Motor Transport Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Oppenheimer v. TamblynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API