Leffingwell v. Glendenning
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
G rutin Smith, Chief Justice.
Appellant and appellees are adjoining homeowners. Appellant’s lot is on ground higher than appellees’ and natural drainage from Leffingwell’s land has frequently flooded appellees’ property. To fend against such recurring problems the Glendennings let a contract for a stone-and-cement wall 140 feet long, 70-ft. of which is along the dividing line between Leffingwell and the Glendennings. Leffingwell complained that the structure encroached upon the southern extremity of his lot and that overlapping varies from a fraction of an inch to almost a foot. The extreme…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Latta v. MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Evans v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Crosby v. BlomerthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Reeves v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Stuttgart Electric Co. v. Riceland Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Brown v. Land, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- McLendon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Fulks v. FredemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.