Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Blomerth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree which ordered the defendant to remove that part of his building which a master, to whom the suit had been referred, found encroached upon and overhung the plaintiff’s land. No appeal was taken from the interlocutory decree overruling exceptions and confirming the master’s report.

The issue which thé appeal presents, as stated in the brief of the defendant, is as follows: “The defendant objected *223to that part of the master’s report which states there was ‘no evidence sufficient to maintain any allegation of laches on the part of the plaintiffs but that they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Spencer Wire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Congregation Beth Israel v. HellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Marcus v. BrodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Carter v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API