Legal Opinion

McGill v. Miller

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1926PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This litigation involves a controversy between appellants McGill and Todd on the one side and appellees Miller and Autry on the other side, concerning the right to use an alley between the several properties occupied by the parties in the city of Little Rock.

Appellee Miller is the owner of lot 3, block 2, of Marshall & Wolfe’s Addition to the city of Little Rock, and appellants McGill and Todd and appellee Autry are the respective owners of portions of lots 4, 5 and 6 of block 2, in Marshall & Wolfe’s Addition. The addition referred to was platted and filed prior to the year 1905 by the then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clay v. PenzelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Medlock v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Scott v. DishoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. KitchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Boullioun v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Harrison v. KnottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Weigel v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Kimmer v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API