Legal Opinion

Streyle v. Steiner Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1984No. 13869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a circuit court order affirming the Division of Labor and Management's decision to dismiss Huida Streyle’s petition for worker’s compensation because of her failure to provide written or actual notice of a work-related injury. We reverse and remand.

Huida Streyle (claimant) is a fifty-year-old woman with an eighth grade education and a history of back problems. She applied for employment with the Steiner Corporation in 1976 and asked for a job with “no heavy lifting.” She was hired as a laundress.

On August 15, 1979, claimant had a hysterectomy. She returned to work on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Wilhelm v. Narregang-Hart Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mellquist v. Dakota Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Rowe v. Semet-Solvay Division Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  5. Schindler v. Manchester Biscuit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Westergren v. Baptist Hospital of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Orth v. Stoebner & Permann Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Vaughn v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. Lake Area HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API