Legal Opinion

Bartrug v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1978PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

Bartrug was indicted and tried for the murder of his neighbor, Mrs. Thornsberry. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of the lesser included offense of first-degree manslaughter. Bartrug appeals. We affirm.

The evidence demonstrated Bartrug had been drinking on the day of the killing, but that he was not “staggering” drunk and could still make rational judgments. He was sufficiently coordinated earlier in the day to go to the reservoir to shoot groundhogs. In the afternoon he complained to Walker about his neighbors. He then walked up the street where he met Mrs. Thornsberry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ratliff v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Conn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  5. McHenry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eugene Williams Gall, Jr. v. Phil Parker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Wellman v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matthews v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Henley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API