Legal Opinion

City of New Bedford v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 2, 2003PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

These appeals arise from an arbitrator’s decision, subsequently affirmed by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), holding the city of New Bed-ford (city) fiable for handicap discrimination against one of its police officers, Henry S. Turgeon, II. The arbitration had proceeded as part of MCAD’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) program. While the MCAD’s review of the arbitrator’s award was pending, Turgeon filed a complaint in the Superior Court to confirm the award pursuant to G. L. c. 251. On the city’s motion, a judge in the Superior Court dismissed the case. When…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Prescott v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Sensing v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Andover Housing Authority v. ShkolnikMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API