United States v. Ronald Frank Romero
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Frank Romero (“Romero”), an Indian, was arrested and indicted for aggravated assault on an Indian reservation against two non-Indians. The federal government asserted criminal jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1152. 1 After receiving instructions from the court that the Government must prove the non-Indian status of the alleged victims, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Romero now appeals the district court’s refusal to grant his post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal, on the grounds that the government failed to offer any evidence that Romero’s alleged…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Springfield v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ZanghiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. OverholtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.