Legal Opinion
Becton-Dickinson & Co. v. Robert P. Scherer Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 17, 1952No. 8073PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Becton-Dickinson & Company, manufacturer of hypodermic syringes and other medical and pharmaceutical equipment and supplies, brought declaratory action against defendant Robert P. Scherer Corporation, large maker of gelatin capsu-lated medicaments, vitamins and the new needleless hypodermic syringe called “Hy-pospray,” to(a) set aside a certain contract, dated August 1, 1947, in which plaintiff is li-censor and Scherer, licensee, of the Marshall L. Lockhart patents involved herein (U. S. Letters Patent Nos. 2,322,245, 2,-380,534 and related patents) and(b) to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- United States v. Standard Electric Time CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
- Marks v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.