Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1967No. Gen. 51,542PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman

This controversy arises from a dispute between two insurance companies concerning the interpretation of their respective insurance policies. Plaintiff, Continental Casualty Company, after paying a $6,350 claim settlement brought this action against Travelers Insurance Company for reimbursement of $5,772.72,10/llths of the settlement. The facts were stipulated and the trial judge held in a memoranda decision that the two excess provisions in the policies of the respective companies nullified each other and held both companies to be primarily liable. Judgment was entered in favor of Continental…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Mission Insurance v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. INS. CAR RENTALS, INC. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API