Mission Insurance v. Allendale Mutual Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dolliver, J. —
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington pursuant to RCW 2.60.020 has certified the following question to this court:
When an insured party suffers a property loss which is fully covered by the policies of two separate insurers, which insured to different policy limits, how should the loss be apportioned between the two insurers under Washington law?
Three approaches have been taken by the courts in resolving this question: (1) Policy Limit. Under this rule, the total loss is prorated on the basis of the maximum coverage limits of each policy.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Insurance Co. of Texas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Dairyland Insurance v. DrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Polygon Northwest Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.