Legal Opinion

Melvin v. Carl

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1931No. Docket No. 519PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

M. E. Melvin, now deceased, and Martha E. Melvin, appellant, had been husband and wife and had lived together as such in the city of Marshalltown, Iowa, for more than thirty years prior to July 12, 1922. During their married life considerable property was accumulated, which, under the laws of Iowa was the separate property of the husband. In November, 1919, they came to Los Angeles for the benefit of the health of M. E. Melvin, returning to their home in Iowa in 1921.

While in California M. E. Melvin purchased two lots in the city of Los Angeles with money which he had acquired in Iowa. On…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cooke v. CookeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Scott v. RemleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API