Legal Opinion

Scott v. Remley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1931No. Docket No. 567PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff is the widow of Hugh A. Scott, deceased, and the executrix of his estate. They were married in Arkansas in 1915 and removed from that state to California in 1919. On October 25, 1928, Hugh A. Scott executed a will in which he made the plaintiff his sole legatee. On November 7, 1928, a written agreement was entered into between these parties in which it was provided that the husband would give to the wife the sum of $4,000, and that all property then owned or later acquired by either, should be the separate property of the respective parties. The $4,000 was paid to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re Estate of DrishausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Estate of LissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API