Legal Opinion

Holt-Fairchild Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 5, 1953No. 49153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

This suit is brought under the War Contract Hardship Claims Act, known as the Lucas Act, 60 Stat. 902, as amended by 62 Stat. 869, 992, 41 U. S. C. § 106 note, to recover the net loss alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff without fault or negligence on its part in the performance of Government contracts between September 16, 1940, and August 14, 1945. By stipulation of the parties, the net loss incurred by plaintiff on all of its Government contracts between September 16, 1940, and August 14,1945, was $43,857.69.

The defendant contends that paragraphs 204 and 307 of Executive Order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. McGann Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. American Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Cowhig v. National Military EstablishmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Chas. M. Dunning Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. Dunning Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API