Legal Opinion

State v. Case

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1966No. 84PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

When, in either a post-conviction hearing or a habeas corpus proceeding, at the prisoner’s request, the court vacates a judgment against him and directs a new trial, the prisoner waives his constitutional protection against double jeopardy, and he may be tried anew on the same indictment for the same offense. In such case, a plea of former jeopardy will avail him nothing. State v. Hollars, 266 N.C. 45, 145 S.E. 2d 309; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437, 144 S.E. 2d 249; State v. Merritt, 264 N.C. 716, 142 S.E. 2d 687; State v. White, 262 N.C. 52, 136 S.E. 2d 205. In this case, however, the new…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. CrockerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. HollarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. People v. . McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API