Baum v. Ohio State Highway Patrol
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The sole issue before this court is whether the State Highway Patrol is immune from liability in the absence of wanton or willful misconduct for injuries caused by a patrol officer in the operation of his vehicle while responding to an emergency call. For the following reasons, we find that *471the State Highway Patrol is immune from liability in the absence of willful or wanton misconduct and, accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment.
In York v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 143, 573 N.E.2d 1063, this court determined that if an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Fish v. CoffeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wallace v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Hoffman v. Gallia Cnty. Sheriff's OfficeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Robertson v. Department of Public Safety, 06ap-1064 (9-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Baum v. Ohio State Hwy. PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.