Legal Opinion

In Re Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1962No. Crim. 7131PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Clarence Arthur Martin petitions for a writ of habeas corpus after a jury conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of section 23102 of the Vehicle Code. Petitioner contends that he was denied an opportunity to obtain a timely sample of his blood by the improper conduct of police officers, and that such conduct constituted a denial of due process of law.

It appears that petitioner was arrested at about 5 p. m. on May 22, 1961, and charged with a violation of the aforementioned statute. Bail was posted and petitioner was released shortly after his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re NewbernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. In re KoehneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McCormick v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1986

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API