Legal Opinion

In re Newbern

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1959No. Crim. No. 6664PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEA, J. pro tem.*

The petitioner in this case is the same individual with whom this court was concerned in a prior case. (In re Newbern, 168 Cal.App.2d 472 [335 P.2d 948].) As was stated in the opinion in that ease he is “a chronic alcoholic and has suffered numerous arrests for drunkenness. ’ ’ His numerous arrests demonstrate that Mr. Newbern is well known to several police departments. His numerous petitions for writs of habeas corpus demonstrate that he is not one “to sleep on his rights.”

The petition, as originally filed in this case, concerned two separate arrests; the first on February…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. DuroncelayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. MunseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  4. In Re NewbernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API