Legal Opinion

McKinney v. State ex rel. Nixon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1889No. 13,026PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

Nixon, as one of the drainage commissioners of Clinton county, brought suit against McKinney and others to enforce payment of assessments made against certain real estate owned by the defendants.

The complaint was held sufficient upon demurrer, and this ruling was affirmed on a former appeal to this court. McKinney v. State, etc., 101 Ind. 355. As will be seen by recurring to the facts as stated in the opinion rendered when the case was here before, a demurrer was sustained to the answer, and the appellants refusing to plead further, the damages were assessed as upon a default.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. AcresIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Test v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. JudayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Stevens v. TempletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API