Legal Opinion

State v. Condon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 2004No. C-030621PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doan, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Thomas Condon, was convicted of eight counts of gross abuse of a corpse pursuant to R.C. 2927.01(B). We affirmed his convictions, see State v. Condon, 152 Ohio App.3d 629, 2003-Ohio-2335, 789 N.E.2d 696, and the Ohio Supreme Court refused to accept the case for review. See State v. Condon, 99 Ohio St.3d 1546, 2003-0hio-4671, 795 N.E.2d 684.

{¶ 2} The convictions were the result of Condon’s using corpses in the Hamilton County Morgue as models for his photographic art without official permission or the consent of the deceased individuals’…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Montilla-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chesher v. NeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. CovenderOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. GilliamOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API