Legal Opinion
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Condon
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2005No. C-040625PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Thomas Condon and his company Thomas Con-don Photography Ltd. (collectively, “Condon”), appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, on its complaint seeking a declaration that it was not obligated to defend or indemnify Condon under its business-insurance policies for federal lawsuits brought by family members of deceased persons whose remains were impermissibly manipulated and photographed by Condon in the Hamilton County Morgue. Because State Farm’s policies excluded coverage…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TekulveOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Chiquita Brands Int'l., Inc. v. Nat'l. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh PaOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Beattie v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WycheOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Caulton, C-080034 (11-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.