Langsdale v. Woollen
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.
This is an action to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, together with damages for its detention. The case was tried at special term, a judgment rendered for the appellee, an appeal taken to general term at which the judgment at special term was affirmed, with a modification as to the amount, of damages, and this appeal is from the judgment at general term.
Several errors are assigned, to which we need not call special attention, but will consider the several questions discussed by appellant’s counsel.
There are three paragraphs in the complaint. By the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rucker v. SteelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lantz v. MaffettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Ferguson v. HullIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Giller v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Rich v. FryIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.