Legal Opinion

Rich v. Fry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1925No. 24,207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

This was an action by appellee Fry and his wife to recover purchase money alleged to be due on a contract between Fry and appellant (defendant). Rich for the purchase of a farm, which the complaint averred had been fully performed on plaintiffs’ part by putting Rich in possession of the premises, and delivering to him abstracts showing that plaintiff had a good merchantable title, and executing and tendering deeds conveying the lands to him; also seeking to reform an alleged mistake in writing one word in the sale contract ; and also seeking to recover on a promissory note payable to Fry and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Born v. . SchrenkeisenNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. McClellandIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sweigart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Duda v. New Prairie United School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Rauschenbach v. Estate of McDanielWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Baker v. AckermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API