Bronson v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF CINCINNATI
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED TRIAL COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO PLAINTIFFS’ REVISING THEIR AMENDED TRIAL COMPLAINT TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS DECISION AND ENTRY; PLAINTIFFS GRANTED TEN DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO FILE REVISED AMENDED TRIAL COMPLAINT
RICE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The captioned cause is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ motion seeking to file an amended trial complaint. The present action is a class action being brought to challenge what is alleged to be de jure racial segregation in the school systems in Cincinnati and in Hamilton County.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- National Solid Waste Management Ass'n v. VoinovichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Board of Education of City School District of Cincinnati v. Department of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Citizens Concerned About Our Children v. School Board of Broward CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.