Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF THIS LAWSUIT IS FAIR, REASONABLE AND ADEQUATE; ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS A CONSENT DECREE AND ORDERING CINCINNATI DEFENDANTS AND STATE DEFENDANTS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
RICE, District Judge.
This lawsuit was initiated on May 29, 1974, when the Plaintiffs, a group of Cincinnati schoolchildren and their parents, filed their Complaint. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati (“Board”), its members and the Superintendent of the Cincinnati…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- In re Dun & Bradstreet Credit Services Customer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Enterprise Energy Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- In re Broadwing, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Kogan v. Aimco Fox Chase, L.P.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.