Legal Opinion
State v. Robinson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1989No. CA88-06-047PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P.J.
Defendant-appellant, Dan D. Robinson, appeals his conviction for failing to securely confine or restrain a vicious dog in violation of R.C. 955.22(D)(1).
On September 29, 1987, the Cler-mont County Chief Dog Warden and two Clermont County Deputy Sheriffs arrived at appellant’s Nicholsville, Ohio, residence in response to a telephone call that several pit bull dogs were running loose. The officials discovered nine dogs in an unlocked fenced enclosure. The animals were confiscated and appellant was charged with multiple violations of R.C. 955.22(D)(1) in addition to several other charges.
Appellan…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- American Dog Owners Ass'n v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- American Dog Owners Ass'n v. Dade County, Fla.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Singer v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Akron v. TiptonAkron Municipal Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.