Legal Opinion

Helen Shaw v. Ohio River Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 4, 1975No. 75--1301PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

The Ohio River Company, owner of towboats operating on the Ohio River, appeals from an order of the district court awarding judgment in favor of one of its seapersons, Helen Shaw, for maintenance and cure in the amount of $7,724.31. 1 In her amended complaint Shaw sought maintenance and cure payments for three distinct periods of illness during 1971, 1972 and 1973. Her illness in 1973 first occurred while she was aboard the motor vessel “Robert P. Ti-bolt” while employed as a maid and cook. The symptoms of her illnesses in 1971 and 1972, however,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. George Barnes v. Andover Company, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Juan Ceja v. Mike Hooks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Hizam Al-Zawkari v. American Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Max Morel v. Sabine Towing & Transportation Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Padilla v. Maersk Lind, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API