Legal Opinion
State v. Belmont Improvement Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1972No. 41826PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Petitioners Joseph and Margie Malinowski, husband and wife, by certiorari (RCW 8.04.070) challenge an order of public use and necessity in eminent domain authorizing the state to take a strip of their property and utilize it for a public road so as to provide access to other property rendered virtually landlocked by a limited access highway project.
The state is constructing a limited access highway, SR 104, as authorized by ROW 47.52.020, in Snohomish County, and in the area near the Malinowskis’ property, parcel 1-7675, it will absorb and widen what is known as Edmonds Way (see Figure A). SR…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Sternoff v. SUP'R CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- STATE, BY STATE H. COMMR. v. Totowa Lum. & Sup. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Sturgill v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BrannanWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005