Fox v. City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiffs in these two actions are husband and wife. They were both injured when a car in which they were *274riding was struck by a car driven by the defendant Green and owned by the appellant city of Syracuse. A judgment in each action was recovered against both defendants. Defendant Green has not appealed. Defendant city of Syracuse conceded on this appeal that the verdicts were not excessive in amount, that there was evidence justifying a finding that defendant Green drove appellant’s car in a negligent manner and that the plaintiffs were free from contributory negligence.
A reversal is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Downing v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Aspinall v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Aspinall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hinchey v. SellersNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- (AMERICAN) LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO. v. Timms & HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Fox v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Enstrom v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.