Legal Opinion

HACKETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 5, 2025No. 2:23-cv-23181Unknown

1Opinion

Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RAFAEL HACKETT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-23181 (ES) (AME) v. OPINION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendants United States Department of Justice (“USDOJ”) and John Jupin’s (“Jupin”) motion to dismiss (D.E. No. 21 (“Motion” or “Mot.”)) pro se plaintiff Rafael Hackett’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (D.E. No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”)). Plaintiff filed an opposition (D.E. No. 25 (“Opp. Br.”)), and USDOJ and Jupin filed a reply (D.E. No. 26 (“Reply…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API