Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of West Hoboken v. Syms

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is a suit upon the bond of one Andrew Anderson, tax collector of said township of West Hoboken, on which bond the defendant, Syms, is the surety. The act of February 13th, 1883 (Rev. Sup., p. 427) provides that any prosecution to be had or commenced upon any bond theretofore or thereafter given by any city, county or township collector, shall in nowise operate against or in any manner affect the sureties named in said bond, unless such prosecution shall be commenced within nine years after the date of said bond, and not after.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowan v. Shapard, Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  2. Jackson v. VarickNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Hallagan v. GoldenNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Allen v. MapesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Gilchrist v. Gilchrist's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anske v. Borough of Palisades ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Brown v. ComerAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API