Legal Opinion

Risinger v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1935No. Civ. 10579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The primary contention of defendant (appellant) is that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence plaintiff’s exhibit number 12 which purported to be a letter from defendant to plaintiff. Before the court admitted the exhibit, plaintiff testified that she had received the letter in question through the mail, that she recognized the signature thereon to be the signature of defendant, and that, indeed, she was positive of it, having received over one hundred letters from him. The letters referred to were before the court, having been admitted in evidence without objection. Under the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Phillips v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Lord v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. First National Bank of Kansas City v. SmirnoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API