Walworth County v. Hartwell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Does. Hartwell have a valid nonconforming use of his property for motorcycle racing under the 1962 amended zoning ordinance?
2. Does the increase in the number of races, participants or spectators constitute a change in the use of the *60premises or merely constitute an intensification of the original nonconforming use ?
Nonconforming me.
The 1962 amended zoning ordinance does not permit motorcycle racing or similar activities in an agricultural district, the zone in which the respondent’s farm lies. In order that a legal nonconforming use of the premises…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sohns v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Gabe v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Waukesha County v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Waukesha County v. Pewaukee Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Town of Richmond v. MurdockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.