Legal Opinion

Walworth County v. Hartwell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1974No. 217PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Does. Hartwell have a valid nonconforming use of his property for motorcycle racing under the 1962 amended zoning ordinance?

2. Does the increase in the number of races, participants or spectators constitute a change in the use of the *60premises or merely constitute an intensification of the original nonconforming use ?

Nonconforming me.

The 1962 amended zoning ordinance does not permit motorcycle racing or similar activities in an agricultural district, the zone in which the respondent’s farm lies. In order that a legal nonconforming use of the premises…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sohns v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gabe v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Waukesha County v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Waukesha County v. Pewaukee Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. Town of Richmond v. MurdockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API