Legal Opinion
Boston Properties v. Pirelli Tire Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1982No. Civ. 62646PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Respondents, Boston Properties, a Massachusetts business trust, and Mortimer B. Zuckerman (hereafter referred to as Boston), filed a complaint and later a first amended complaint (hereafter the complaint) against appellants, Pirelli Tire Corporation, Pirelli Sales Pacific and Pirelli Sales West, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Pirelli or appellants) and others for unlawful detainer, seeking a forfeiture of the lease entered into between appellants as lessees, and respondents as lessors, on certain property in Los Angeles County, seeking to be restored to possession of those…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- American City Bank v. ZetlenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell Land & Improvement Co. v. Ristorante Ferrantelli, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- MITCHELL LAND AND IMPROVEMENT CO. v. Ristorante Ferrantelli, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wilson v. Bill Barry Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thrifty Oil Co. v. BatarseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n ex rel. First Security Bank, N.A. v. Southeastern New Mexico Affordable Housing Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.