Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Judge Russell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 2019No. 1jd/18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

The Maryland Judiciary serves the public by endeavoring to preserve the principles of justice. In furtherance of the judiciary's task and role in society, it is critical that Maryland judges uphold the dignity of the office and aspire to maintain public confidence in the judiciary. As such, judges, at all times, are expected to conform their conduct to ethical standards, which are codified in the Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct. When a judge's conduct falls short of that which is expected by the Rules, the judge may be subject to disciplinary proceedings and sanctions. Maryland Rule…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Hon. AdemiluyiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  2. State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API