Legal Opinion

In re Wilhelm

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 25, 1938No. 9118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChesnut, District Judge

The decision as to the status of these two claims involves the proper construction and application of the Maryland statute (1935 Supp.Ann.Code of Maryland, Art. 21, § 55), requiring the recording of conditional contracts of sale, and providing that on failure thereof, they shall “be void as to third parties without notice until” so recorded.1 The claimants are re*441spectively conditional vendors who have filed petitions for possession of the articles sold,, and the trustee in bankruptcy is opposing the petitions. In both cases the conditional contracts were' recorded, but in one case not until…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moore v. BaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Dyson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  4. Textor v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Hoffman v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tatelbaum v. National Store Fixture Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API