Bishop v. Hansen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Becker, A.C. J.
To satisfy the statute of frauds for a real estate brokerage agreement, the written agreement must specify how the broker is to be paid. If the broker is to receive a commission based on the sales price of the property, the listing price is not a necessary term and its absence will not invalidate the agreement.
Appellants Elsie and James Hansen entered into an exclusive real estate listing agreement with Roy Bishop, a real estate broker. The listing agreement, written on a form contract, stated that Bishop would have the “sole and exclusive right” to submit offers to purchase…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Maybury v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.