Ericksen v. Village of Willow Springs
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay the action. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim is denied. Defendants’ motion to stay the action pending disposition of an action in state court is granted.
Facts
Beginning in 1982, Eyvind J. Ericksen III (“Mr. Ericksen”) was employed by the Willow Springs Police Department (“Department”) as a patrol officer. On several occasions since April, 1986, Mr. Ericksen received verbal assurances from…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jacobeit v. Rich Township High School District 227District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Edge Inv., LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dwyer v. EvoyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Ruffino v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Ponder v. County Of WinnebagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021