Legal Opinion

Matter of Pauk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of five presentments filed by the District VIII Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee), which concluded in each matter that respondent was guilty of unethical conduct. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with the Ethics Committee’s finding of unethical conduct. Upon review of the first two presentments, involving the Schiffner and Paulus matters, the DRB recommended that respondent be temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending final disposition of all the ethics complaints against him. Decision and Recommendation issued December 15,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Matter of JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Matter of O'GormanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of SilvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Matter of SimeoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. In re RosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API