Legal Opinion

Town of Brookline v. Goldstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 14, 1983PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

The plaintiff, the town of Brookline, commenced this action against the defendants seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. The town claimed that Melvin Goldstein had (1) instituted improper and frivolous legal proceedings against the town, its officers, employees, boards, commissions, and elected officials; and (2) harassed a substantial number of town employees and officials by calling them repeatedly during working hours at the town’s offices and at their homes during the early morning and late evening, as well as weekends.

After a hearing, a judge of the Superior Court issued a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SchumacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API