Legal Opinion

Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1976No. 75-1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

In May 1971 this court set aside an order of the Federal Communications Commission denying the request of Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. (MMA), a community antenna television (CATV) system operator, for waiver of the non-duplication provisions of the rules of the Commission.1 We then remanded the case to the Commission so that it might ’“set forth in detail its conclusions and the reasons for them” on certain key issues. On remand, the Commission ordered an evidentiary hearing on these issues, made findings of fact, and once again denied the waiver…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Wheeling Antenna Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Wtrf-Tv, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Easton Publishing Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API