Legal Opinion

Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1976No. 75-1889Published

1Opinion of the Court

535 F.2d 214

MEADVILLE MASTER ANTENNA, INC., Meadville, Pennsylvania, Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of

America, Respondents,

Great Lakes Communications, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 75-1889.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 8, 1975.

Decided April 12, 1976.

George J. Barco, Yolanda G. Barco, Atty., Barco & Barco, Meadville, Pa., Frederick W. Ford, Pittman, Lovett, Ford & Hennessey, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Thomas E. Kauper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Carl D. Lawson, Lee I. Weintraub, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Ashton R. Hardy, Gen.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Wheeling Antenna Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Wtrf-Tv, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API