Legal Opinion

Bogalusa Ice Co. v. Moffett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 2, 1937No. 34584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to dissolve a writ of sequestration and set aside a temporary restraining order. The matter is submitted for our determination.

The facts are as follows: The plaintiff,. Bogalusa Ice Company, instituted a suit against the defendants, Richard Moffett and Ollie C. Moffett, claiming the ownership of a truck and certain appurtenances, thereto. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants had previously been engaged in the sale-of ice on commission, using the truck, etc., for the purpose of delivering the plaintiff’s, ice to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen, West & Bush v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Vidal v. Sterlington Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Meine v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Bogalusa Ice Co. v. MoffettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API