Bogalusa Ice Co. v. Moffett
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to dissolve a writ of sequestration and set aside a temporary restraining order. The matter is submitted for our determination.
The facts are as follows: The plaintiff,. Bogalusa Ice Company, instituted a suit against the defendants, Richard Moffett and Ollie C. Moffett, claiming the ownership of a truck and certain appurtenances, thereto. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants had previously been engaged in the sale-of ice on commission, using the truck, etc., for the purpose of delivering the plaintiff’s, ice to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen, West & Bush v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Vidal v. Sterlington Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Meine v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ludwig v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Bogalusa Ice Co. v. MoffettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.