Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. Calloway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 6, 1939No. 35163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought for the purpose of having the commercial co-partnership, composed solely of plaintiff and defendant, dissolved and liquidated. It was alleged in the petition that the parties entered into an agreement to conduct a drug store business, the defendant to furnish the initial capital and the plaintiff to furnish his services as manager of the business; that the interest of the defendant in the partnership was to be two-thirds, and the plaintiff, one-third, the assets being owned in that proportion, the profits to be shared on that basis and the liabilities to be assumed in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen, West & Bush v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Schwan v. SchwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Eltringham v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Succession of PavelkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Ramos Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. C. Trahan Drilling Contractor, Inc. v. Robert D. Sterling and Ruth L. Sterling, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Joiner v. Bill Hood Ford, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. TAK, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
  4. Weilbaecher v. JeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API